Improving Ohio's Health: Ohio Hospital Inpatient Discharges for Diabetes and Hypertension

Ohio Hospital Inpatient Discharges for Diabetes and Hypertension[1] 

By Cathy Costello, JD, Director of CliniSyncPLUS Services

This article is the first in a series devoted to diabetes and hypertension in Ohio and the prevalence of these chronic conditions. It explores efforts to quantify the impact of these two conditions on inpatient rates in Ohio counties.

Healthcare providers are inundated with statistics about the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in the United States. Patients with chronic diseases drive the costs in the American healthcare system, both inpatient and ambulatory. About 86% of the United States annual healthcare spending is related to chronic diseases.[1] According to a 2012 report by the American Diabetes Association, the total economic cost of diabetes in the United States was $245 billion with Ohio accounting for $9.3 billion of those costs.[2] In 2013, 921,012 people in Ohio were diagnosed with diabetes, ranking Ohio seventh among all states in number of people with diabetes.[3]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Funding to Comprehensively Address Chronic Disease

To more effectively manage these chronic conditions and reduce their prevalence in the population, CDC has funded two grant programs through 2018 with state health departments across the country. These grants support population-wide approaches to prevent obesity, diabetes, heart disease and stroke and to reduce the disparities in priority populations. All states received initial funding in 2013 to support state-level activities.[4] In 2014, 17 states, including Ohio, were competitively awarded additional funds to support a broad scale multi-year initiative at the state and local levels.[5] Both grants contain strategies to support the use of health information technology to improve performance and increase the implementation of quality improvement processes in health systems.

The second CDC grant received by Ohio takes a more in-depth local look at prediabetes screening and various other strategies to improve obesity, diabetes, heart disease and stroke outcomes in selected communities. The counties that are part of this more targeted grant are Athens, Lorain, Montgomery, Richland, Summit and Washington. In these counties, ODH is providing support to county health departments to increase residents’ opportunities for physical activity and access to healthy foods, as well as participation in lifestyle change programs (such as the National Diabetes Prevention Program). For providers, the grants are designed to improve the use of electronic health systems for quality data monitoring and reporting of diabetes and hypertension related conditions. The work on these two grants reflects in part the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) premise that there is a close relationship between what occurs in the community setting and the inpatient setting.

The work of these CDC grants can ultimately contribute to reducing the rate of inpatient admissions for patients with hypertension and/or diabetes.

Ohio Data on Hypertension and Diabetes in the Hospital Setting Diabetes and hypertension data from all 88 Ohio counties were compiled from two areas: 1) hospital inpatient rates of admissions for patients with diabetes or hypertension; and, 2) ambulatory quality data that tracks HgA1c and blood pressure. These de-identified data were aggregated and reported by county. 

The hospital data are displayed at the county level for inpatient discharges where either hypertension, diabetes or both conditions appeared on the patient’s problem list. The Ohio Health Information Partnership obtained data from the Ohio Hospital Association and individual hospitals around the state.

In Ohio, out of the 1.1 million inpatient hospital discharges in 2014, nearly 6 out of every 10 discharged patients had hypertension in their problem list. Four out of every 10 patients had diabetes listed. The county with the highest percent of discharges related to diabetes was Jackson County (53.1%). Washington County was the highest county for inpatient discharges linked to hypertension (66.5%). The percent of inpatient discharges for diabetes and hypertension are listed in Table 1 for all Ohio counties:

Table 1: 2014 HOSPITAL INPATIENT DATA ON DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION DISCHARGES IN OHIO, BY COUNTY
(A map showing the data by region is included on the last page of this document)

 

Counties Diabetes as % of Total Inpatient Discharges Hypertension as % of Total Inpatient Discharges Counties Diabetes as % of Total Inpatient Discharges Hypertension as % of Total Inpatient Discharges
Average for All Ohio Counties 43.1% 56.2%      
Adams 48.0% 62.2% Licking 41.6% 51.9%
Allen 46.2% 56.9% Logan 40.5% 55.6%
Ashland 44.8% 62.7% Lorain 43.8% 58.9%
Ashtabula 45.1% 57.9% Lucas 45.0% 55.9%
Athens 47.6% 60.3% Madison 45.1% 59.7%
Auglaize 40.3% 54.6% Mahoning 46.3% 57.9%
Belmont 46.5% 59.5% Marion 49.8% 61.3%
Brown 48.8% 60.4% Medina 38.2% 55.0%
Butler 43.7% 57.0% Meigs 49.4% 60.9%
Carroll 46.0% 61.2% Mercer 40.3% 55.2%
Champaign 46.1% 61.0% Miami 41.2% 52.0%
Clark 49.0% 62.4% Monroe 43.5% 63.7%
Clermont 42.1% 56.1% Montgomery 43.6% 55.5%
Clinton 42.4% 53.3% Morgan 49.4% 64.0%
Columbiana 46.9% 58.3% Morrow 43.7% 61.6%
Coshocton 45.7% 60.5% Muskingum 45.2% 61.2%
Crawford 49.7% 60.5% Noble 46.2% 62.9%
Cuyahoga 42.9% 55.6% Ottawa 43.9% 60.2%
Darke 39.0% 51.8% Paulding 46.5% 54.5%
Defiance 45.0% 53.9% Perry 41.8% 57.0%
Delaware 34.2% 52.2% Pickaway 45.4% 57.8%
Erie 44.9% 59.8% Pike 50.5% 59.8%
Fairfield 42.8% 56.0% Portage 40.2% 57.0%
Fayette 47.4% 59.2% Preble 45.1% 57.9%
Franklin 39.8% 51.8% Putnam 35.6% 51.9%
Fulton 42.7% 54.2% Richland 45.1% 60.4%
Gallia 45.8% 57.4% Ross 45.7% 55.2%
Geauga 34.0% 55.0% Sandusky 45.3% 57.1%
Greene 43.3% 54.9% Scioto 51.3% 64.4%
Guernsey 48.2% 63.9% Seneca 42.1% 53.2%
Hamilton 41.4% 53.1% Shelby 37.3% 52.0%
Hancock 37.4% 50.3% Stark 43.9% 57.7%
Hardin 45.9% 61.9% Summit 42.7% 58.0%
Harrison 45.8% 59.1% Trumbull 45.4% 57.3%
Henry 42.8% 55.8% Tuscarawas 46.0% 60.2%
Highland 44.1% 55.3% Union 43.0% 55.4%
Hocking 43.9% 54.5% Van Wert 42.6% 52.1%
Holmes 40.9% 54.7% Vinton 52.7% 63.2%
Huron 43.6% 55.0% Warren 36.7% 51.1%
Jackson 53.1% 64.6% Washington 50.0% 66.5%
Jefferson 48.8% 60.0% Wayne 42.7% 58.8%
Knox 42.6% 58.5% Williams 39.5% 47.5%
Lake 43.0% 59.3% Wood 41.9% 52.6%
Lawrence 47.4% 57.4% Wyandot 38.7% 49.6%
Copyright 2016 Ohio Hospital Association Source: OHA Statewide Clinical and Financial Database
By aggregating the data by region, a clearer picture emerges of variations around the state. As shown in Table 2, the region with the lowest percent of inpatient discharges that are linked to patients with either diabetes or hypertension is the Southwest region. This region (which includes Cincinnati) has only 41.7% of its discharges linked to diabetes (compared to the statewide average of 43.1%) and 54.4% of its discharges are linked to hypertension (statewide average 56.2%). The Southeast region has the highest rates of diabetes and hypertension among inpatient discharges (47.3% and 60.4%, respectively).

 

Table 2: 2014 HOSPITAL INPATIENT DATA ON DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION DISCHARGES IN OHIO,

BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

 

Totals for Ohio Regions Total Inpatient Discharges Total Inpatient Discharges Where Diabetes Was Listed % Inpatient Discharges Where Diabetes Was Listed Total Inpatient Discharges Where Hypertension Was Listed % Inpatient Discharges Where Hypertension Was Listed
Ohio 1,122,047 484,013 43.1% 630,099 56.2%
Southeast Region: (Adams, Athens, Belmont, Carroll, Coshocton, Gallia, Guernsey, Harrison, Highland, Hocking, Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Lawrence, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, Pike, Ross, Scioto, Vinton, Washington) 96,217 45,545 47.3% 58,143 60.4%
Southwest Region: (Brown, Butler, Clermont, Hamilton, Warren) 153,982 64,268 41.7% 83,710 54.4%
West Central Region: (Auglaize, Champaign, Clark, Clinton, Darke, Fayette, Greene, Mercer, Miami, Montgomery, Preble, Shelby) 123,749 54,077 43.7% 69,315 56.0%
Northwest Region: (Allen, Crawford, Defiance, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry, Lucas, Ottawa, Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, Seneca, Van Wert, Williams, Wood, Wyandot) 127,843 56,261 44.0% 70,747 55.3%
Northeast Region: (Ashland, Ashtabula, Columbiana, Cuyahoga, Erie, Geauga, Huron, Lake, Lorain, Mahoning, Medina, Portage, Richland, Stark, Summit, Trumbull, Tuscarawas, Wayne) 441,298 191,070 43.3% 252,679 57.3%
Central Region (Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, Logan, Madison, Marion, Morrow, Pickaway, Union) 178,958 72,792 40.7% 95,505 53.4%
Copyright 2016 Ohio Hospital Association Source: OHA Statewide Clinical and Financial Database

A significant rate of diabetes and hypertension was also identified among people who use Emergency Department (ED) services. For the state of Ohio, the average number of patients with diabetes who utilized the ED was 13.8%. The average number of patients with hypertension who utilized the ED was 22.6%. 

Identifying Individuals with Two or More Chronic Conditions

One in four Americans have two or more chronic conditions.[6] It is important to note, too, that a significant number of hospital admissions and ED visits are linked to patients who have both diabetes and hypertension. In Ohio, 15.1% of all inpatient discharges involve patients who have both diabetes and hypertension. This is important information for providers in Ohio to know because CMS has focused its attention on providing increased care to patients who have two or more chronic conditions. Reflecting this fact, CMS has focused much of its new payment reform models on the management of these two conditions. Within the past two years, CMS has established a new billing code for chronic care management (99490) that permits practices to bill for time spent managing a patient’s care between visits. Chronic care coding is in addition to the transitional care management codes that allow a practice to bill a higher level of visit within two weeks post-discharge (99495 and 99496). The second article to be published in this series: New Approaches to Managing Chronic Conditions, will discuss how these codes can be used to assist practices in managing patient care in the ambulatory setting.

For more information on the requirements for chronic care management billing, please see the CMS tip sheet on CCM: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/ChronicCareManagement.pdf  

Two common quality metrics used by medical practices to monitor diabetes and hypertension control rates in the office setting are being used to measure improvement over the course of the grants. Practices are being asked to share their data on NQF #0018, CMS 165 or PQRS #236 (Patients with hypertension under control: < 140/90) and NQF #0059, CMS 122 or PQRS #001 (Patients with diabetes out of control or not monitored: HgA1c > 9.0%). These are measures usually reported as a part of the Meaningful Use or PQRS programs. The information on each county’s performance metrics on the A1c and hypertension measures will be discussed in the third article in this series: Ohio Ambulatory Data on Hypertension and Diabetes Management.

Note: If you are interested in having your data aggregated with other providers in your county, you may contact Cathy Rich at 614.664.2606 or email her at crich@ohiponline.org with your numerator and denominator figure for these two quality metrics. If your organization is part of a system, Cathy can let you know if the system is already reporting data.

                                                         
Click the picture to enlarge.                   Click on the document above to download. 

 

[1]  This article was supported by Cooperative Agreement #5NU58DP005508 and #6NU58DP004826, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services.”

[2] Gerteis J, Izrael D, Deitz D, LeRoy L, Ricciardi R, Miller T, Basu J. Multiple Chronic Conditions Chartbook.[PDF - 10.62 MB] AHRQ Publications No, Q14-0038. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Accessed November 18, 2014.

[3] American Diabetes Association, “Economic Costs of Diabetes in the United States in 2012,” Diabetes Care, March 6, 2013.

[4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Division of Diabetes Translation. US Diabetes Surveillance System(http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/index.html). Available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data.

[5] CDC-RFA-DP13-1305: State Public Health Actions to Prevent and Control Diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity and Associated Risk Factors and Promote School Health.

[6] CDC-RFA-DP14-1422: State and Local Public Health Actions to Prevent Obesity, Diabetes, Heart Disease and Stroke.

[7] Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:130389. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130389

 

 

 

 


For better mobile viewing, please turn your phone to a vertical position.

OK

Please maximize your browser window for the best browsing experience.

OK